Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2017] NZERA Auckland 181
Hearing date 16-Jun-17
Determination date 26 June 2017
Member D Appleton
Representation A Halse ; P Muir, C Blake
Location Auckland
Parties Morgan v Auckland District Health Board
Summary DISPUTE - GOOD FAITH - Parties disputed whether respondent exercised good faith in considering applicant’s application for paid special leave - Applicant remained away from work after making assault and bullying complaint against colleagues - UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Applicant claimed unjustifiability disadvantaged by way respondent dealt with application for paid special leave - Forensic Pathology Technician
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND -;DISPUTE - GOOD FAITH: Ongoing WorkSafe investigation does not mean workplace unsafe. Respondent did not breach good faith when declining to grant special leave when applicant still had sick leave owing. Applicant no longer has sick leave owing and so respondent cannot continue to rely on this. In light of general duty of good faith respondent should undertake formal assessment again as to whether to grant applicant special leave. Respondent should consider specified factors when making decision. Respondent has right to protect itself from self-incrimination in WorkSafe investigation. Questions answered. Orders made.;UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE: Applicant did not put new request to respondent to expressly consider special leave application after sick leave ran out. Respondent still to carry out consideration exercise. No unjustified disadvantage.
Result Questions answered ; Orders made ; Application dismissed (unjustified disadvantage) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Dispute
Statutes ERA s4(1)(a) ; ERA s4(1)(b) ; ERA s110A ; ERA s100D ; Evidence Act 2006 s60 ; Health and Safety at Work Act 2015
Cases Cited Dorset v Chemcolour Industries (NZ) Ltd ERA Auckland AA117/04, 8 April 2004
Number of Pages 19
PDF File Link: 2017_NZERA_Auckland_181.pdf [pdf 148 KB]