| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2017] NZERA Christchurch 118 |
| Determination date | 06 July 2017 |
| Member | D Appleton |
| Representation | J Goldstein ; D Beck |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Roach v Nazareth Care Charitable Trust Board |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Applicant sought removal of matter to Employment Court (“EC”) on ground important question of law likely to arise and matter of such nature and urgency that in public interest matter should be removed – Business Manager |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND –;PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Question of law already substantially answered by EC. No important question of law likely to arise. Not in urgent public interest to remove matter. Application for removal dismissed. |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | ERA s6 ; ERA s6(1) ; ERA s6(1)(b)(ii) ; ERA s67A ; ERA s67A(3) ; ERA s178 ; ECA s94 |
| Cases Cited | Blackmore v Honick Properties Ltd [2011] NZEmpC 152 ; [2011] ERNZ 445 ; Hanlon v International Educational Foundation (NZ) Inc [1995] 1 ERNZ 1 (EmpC) ; McAlister v Air New Zealand Ltd EmpC Auckland AC22/05, 11 May 2005 |
| Number of Pages | 13 |
| PDF File Link: | 2017_NZERA_Christchurch_118.pdf [pdf 251 KB] |