| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2017] NZERA Christchurch 136 |
| Determination date | 04 August 2017 |
| Member | D Appleton |
| Representation | M McDonald ; J Dawson |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Clark v Canterbury Butynol Fixers Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS – Successful personal grievance claim – Half day investigation meeting – Applicant sought $2,710 contribution towards costs – Authority found no reason to increase daily tariff because extra head of claim successful – Found penalty and costs application very simple – Found appropriate to apply daily tariff – Respondent to pay applicant $2,250 contribution towards costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of Applicant ($2,250) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA Second Schedule cl15 |
| Cases Cited | Clark v Canterbury Butynol Fixers Ltd [2017] NZERA Christchurch 119;Fagotti v Acme & Co Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 135, (2015) NZELR 1;PBO Ltd (Formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 (EmpC) |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2017_NZERA_Christchurch_136.pdf [pdf 96 KB] |