| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2017] NZERA Auckland 239 |
| Determination date | 16 August 2017 |
| Member | J Crichton |
| Representation | PD Lorigan (in person) ; R Towner, S Maxfield |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Applicant sought removal of matter to Employment Court (“EC”) on ground important question of law likely to arise – Respondent consented to application for removal but disagreed that important question of law likely to arise |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Matter did not involve complex issues of law. Referral appropriate as matters between the parties involving the same or similar facts already before the Court. Matter removed. |
| Result | Application granted ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | ERA s178(2)(a) ERA s178(2)(c) ERA s178(2)(d) |
| Number of Pages | 6 |
| PDF File Link: | 2017_NZERA_Auckland_239.pdf [pdf 99 KB] |