Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2017] NZERA Auckland 288
Hearing date 19-Jun-17
Determination date 15 September 2017
Member N Craig
Representation R Tupaea ; A O'Connor
Location Auckland
Parties Johnson v S.T. Linehaul Ltd
Summary PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Whether proceedings commenced within 3 years of raising grievance – RAISING PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – Applicant sought leave to raise grievances out of time – Foreman
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Applicant applied for proceedings in regard to a grievance relating to requests for days off work within 3 years of being raised. Application granted.RAISING PERSONAL GRIEVANCE: Applicant did not raise other grievances in time. Applicant applied for leave to grant multiple grievances out of time. Applicant could not establish on his evidence exceptional circumstances to raise grievances late. Leave to raise grievance out of time declined. Application dismissed.
Result Application granted (practice and procedure) ; Application dismissed (Raising personal grievance) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Practice & Procedure
Statutes ERA s103(1)(b);ERA s114;ERA s114(1);ERA s114(2);ERA s114(3);ERA s114(4);ERA s114(6);ERA s115;ERA s115(a);ERA s174E
Cases Cited Austin v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 30;Board of Trustees of Te Kura Kaupapa Motuhake O Tawhiuau v Edmonds [2008] ERNZ 139 (EmpC);Clark v Nelson Malborough Institute of Technology (2008) 5 NZELR 628 (EmpC);Creedy v Commissioner of Police [2006] ERNZ 517 (EmpC);Gates v Air New Zealand Ltd (2009) 7 NZELR 41 (EmpC);McClutchie v Landcorp Farming Ltd [1993] 1 ERNZ 388 (EmpC);Muggeridge v Miden Construction Co Ltd [1992] 1 ERNZ 232 (EmpC);Premier Events Group Ltd v Beattie (No 3) [2012] NZEmpC 79;Telecom New Zealand Ltd v Morgan [2004] 2 ERNZ 9 (EmpC)
Number of Pages 17
PDF File Link: 2017_NZERA_Auckland_288.pdf [pdf 268 KB]