Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No [2017] NZERA Christchurch 161
Hearing date 22-Jun-17
Determination date 26 September 2017
Member H Doyle
Representation P Cahill ; P Shaw
Location Christchurch
Parties Chapman-Labecka v Vetlife Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Redundancy – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Veterinarian
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Genuine redundancy situation. Respondent provided adequate consultation over disestablishment of applicant’s position and opportunity to respond. Respondent breached duty of good faith where applicant not informed of new selection criteria for remaining position. Respondent provided unspecified offers of support. A fair and reasonable employer expected to provide advice of specific support. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: No contributory conduct. Respondent to pay applicant $13,071 reimbursement of lost wages. $10,000 compensation appropriate.
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($13,071) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($10,000) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s4;ERA s4(1A)(c);ERA s103A
Cases Cited Angus v Ports of Auckland Ltd [2011] NZEmpC 160;Grace Team Accounting Ltd v Brake [2014] NZCA 541;Jinkinson v Oceania Gold (NZ) Ltd (No 2) [2010] NZEmpC 102;Stevens v Hapag-Lloyd (NZ) Ltd [2015] ERNZ 224 (EmpC)
Number of Pages 24
PDF File Link: 2017_NZERA_Christchurch_161.pdf [pdf 199 KB]