| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Wellington |
| Reference No | [2017] NZERA Wellington 94 |
| Determination date | 28 September 2017 |
| Member | V Campbell |
| Representation | P Cranney ; S Hornsby-Geluk |
| Location | Wellington |
| Parties | New Zealand Public Service Association Te Pukenga Here Tikanga Mahi & Ors v Commissioner and Chief Executive Inland Revenue Department Te Tare Taake |
| Other Parties | Kupa, Meredith & Minto |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Applicants sought removal to the Employment Court (“EC”) on grounds important question of law are likely to arise and matter of such nature and urgency that in public interest matter should be removed |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND –;PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Questions raised by applicant important questions of law which could affect large number of employees. Matter of urgency and public interest. Appropriate for EC to determine matter. Application for removal granted |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | ERA s178(2) |
| Cases Cited | Hanlon v International Educational Foundation (NZ) Inc [1995] 1 ERNZ 1 (EmpC);McAlister v Air New Zealand Ltd EmpC Auckland AC22/05, 11 May 2005 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2017_NZERA_Wellington_94.pdf [pdf 99 KB] |