| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Wellington |
| Reference No | [2017] NZERA Wellington 98 |
| Determination date | 02 October 2017 |
| Member | M Loftus |
| Representation | H Kynaston, E McLean ; A Parr (in person) |
| Location | Wellington |
| Parties | Western Institute of Technology at Taranaki v Parr |
| Summary | COSTS – Successful compliance order and penalty claims – One day investigation meeting – Applicant sought $13,643 contribution towards costs – Authority found appropriate to apply normal daily tariff as applicant’s argument that it was forced to litigate because respondent’s behaviour was not convincing – Respondent to pay applicant $5,700 contribution towards costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of applicant ($5,700) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($1,200)(expert witness)(document server) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA s148 |
| Cases Cited | Fagotti v Acme & Co [2015] EmpC 135;PBO Ltd (Formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 (EmpC);Western Institute of Technology at Taranaki v Parr [2017] NZERA Wellington 73 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2017_NZERA_Wellington_98.pdf [pdf 96 KB] |