| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2017] NZERA Auckland 310 |
| Determination date | 06 October 2017 |
| Member | E Robinson |
| Representation | B Walker (in person) ; D Gelb |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Walker v New Zealand Compliance and Repairs Ltd |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Whether grievance raised within 90 days – Mechanic |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND –;PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Grievance not raised within 90 days. Respondent did not consent to grievance being raised out of time. No exceptional circumstances to justify granting leave to raise grievance out of time. |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Raising PG |
| Statutes | ERA s114(1);ERA s114(4)(a);ERA s115(b);ERA s115(c);ERA s115(d);Holidays Act 2003 s15;Holidays Act 2003 s27(2);Holidays Act 2003 s24;Holidays Act 2003 s28 |
| Cases Cited | Underhill v Coca-Cola Amati (NZ) Ltd [2017] NZEmpC 117;Winstone Wallboards Ltd v Samate [1993] 1 ERNZ 503 (EmpC) |
| Number of Pages | 15 |
| PDF File Link: | 2017_NZERA_Auckland_310.pdf [pdf 291 KB] |