Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2017] NZERA Auckland 355
Hearing date 1-Aug-17
Determination date 13 November 2017
Member N Craig
Representation M Roberts ; D Ure
Location Gisborne
Parties Boone v Thornton Green Holdings Ltd and Anor
Other Parties Car Finance 2U Ltd
Summary PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Identity of employer – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Finance and Insurance Broker
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: A reference letter from applicant’s lawyer to respondent detailed applicant's employer as first respondent trading as the second respondent. Applicant’s payslips refer to second respondent as employer. Evidence supports applicant employed by second respondent. Applicant employed by second respondent. UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Text message sent to applicant dismissing him without explanation. Respondent did not act as a fair and reasonable employer could have in all the circumstnaces. Applicant given no opportunity to respond to companies concerns. Respondent did not provide applicant with payment in lieu of notice for dismissal under employment agreement. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: 30 per cent contributory conduct. Second respondent to pay applicant three months’ reimbursement of lost wages and $1,983 reimbursement of immigration expenses. $7,000 compensation appropriate.
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages (quantum to be determined) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($7,000) ; Reimbursement of immigration expenses ($1,983.10) ; Reimbursement of expenses incurred prior to dismissal ($881.56) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A(3);ERA s103A(5);ERA s124;ERA s128(2);ERA s174E
Cases Cited Hall v Smith Crane & Construction Ltd [2014] NZERA Christchurch 146;Harris v The Warehouse Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 188;Salt v Fell [2008] NZCA 128
Number of Pages 18
PDF File Link: 2017_NZERA_Auckland_355.pdf [pdf 223 KB]