| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2017] NZERA Christchurch 202 |
| Determination date | 23 November 2017 |
| Member | T MacKinnon |
| Representation | R Thompson ; S Derhamy (in person), S Khayyat (in person) |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Maaroufe v Advanced Pipeline Christchurch Ltd and Ors |
| Other Parties | Derhamy, Khayyat, Rahimi |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Whether second, third and fifth respondents could be named as respondents |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND –;PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Only first respondent meet criterion to satisfy employment relationship with applicant. Applicant has no basis to progress claims against second, third and fifth respondents. Applicant could not continue action against first respondent without agreement of liquidator or orders from High Court. Second, third and fifth respondent’s names struck out from proceedings. |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | Companies Act 1993 s248;ERA s4;ERA s63A;ERA s103(1);ERA s174D(2);ERA s174D(3);ERA s221 |
| Cases Cited | Maaroufe v Advanced Pipeline Christchurch Ltd [2017] NZERA Christchurch 2 |
| Number of Pages | 5 |
| PDF File Link: | 2017_NZERA_Christchurch_202.pdf [pdf 100 KB] |