Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No [2017] NZERA Christchurch 204
Hearing date 24 & 25 Nov and 21 Dec 2016 & 29 Aug 2017 (4 days)
Determination date 30 November 2017
Member C Hickey
Representation B Manning ; P Churchman QC, C Kenworthy
Location Christchurch & Invercargill
Parties Glasson v Southern District Health Board
Summary DISPUTE – Parties disputed which of two Multi-Employer Collective Agreements (“MECA”) covered applicant’s work – Applicant claims work only covered by sonographers MECA – Respondent claims applicant’s work solely covered by clinical physiologists MECA – Echocardiography Specialist Technologist
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;DISPUTE: Applicant is able to practice as both clinical physiologist and sonographer. Applicant falls under MECA coverage clauses of both clinical physiologists and sonographers. Applicant’s job title and description not determinative of work actually performed. Applicant holds required qualifications and can practice within scope of practice as sonographer. Role of sonographer and clinical physiologist are not determined by level of supervision. Applicant requested to be moved from clinical psychologist MECA to sonographers MECA in May 2013. Issue lies with respondent’s lack of consideration that applicants work could fall under a more favourable collective agreement. Substantial bulk of applicant’s work as sonographer and is covered under sonographers MECA. Respondent to pay applicant as if she had been on Sonographers MECA since June 2013 following applicant’s request to be moved to sonographers MECA. Parties to attend mediation to seek to agree how much respondent owes applicant. Questions answered.
Result Questions answered ; Costs reserved
Main Category Dispute
Statutes ERA s54(3)(a)(i);ERA s56;Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act s8;Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act s11;Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act s12
Cases Cited Aviation and Marine Engineers Association Inc v Air New Zealand [2013] NZEmpC 172;Wilson v Dalgety and Co Ltd [1940] NZLR 323 (SC)
Number of Pages 21
PDF File Link: 2017_NZERA_Christchurch_204.pdf [pdf 288 KB]