Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No [2017] NZERA Wellington 130
Hearing date 28-Aug-17
Determination date 13 December 2017
Member V Campbell
Representation J Murphy ; G Mason
Location Wellington
Parties Stevens v Alison Green Lawyer Ltd and Anor
Other Parties Green
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Constructive Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – COUNTERCLAIM – PENALTY – GOOD FAITH – Respondent sought penalty for applicant’s breach of good faith – Support Legal Executive
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Issuance of a verbal warning was action an employer acting fairly and reasonably could do in all the circumstances. Second respondent had genuine concerns about applicants’ mistakes on client files. Second respondent entitled to raise concerns and to have them addressed in accordance with terms of employment agreement. Not satisfied that respondent followed course of conduct with deliberate purpose of coercing applicant to resign. No constructive dismissal. Dismissal justified. COUNTERCLAIM – PENALTY – GOOD FAITH: No correspondence to support the claim that respondent wanted applicant to work out her notice period. Respondent accepted applicant’s resignation and paid out her final pay. No duty on employee to advise employer that they have accepted alternative employment. Respondent could not establish any breach of good faith by applicant.
Result Applications dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103AERA s174E
Cases Cited Auckland Shop Employees Union v Woolworths (NZ) Ltd [1985] 2 NZLR 372 (CA);Trotter v Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Ltd [1993] 2 ERNZ 659 (EmpC);Wellington, Taranaki and Marlborough Clerical IUOW v Greenwich (t/a Greenwich and Associates Employment Agency and Complete Fitness Centre) (1983) ERNZ Sel Cas 95 (AC)
Number of Pages 16
PDF File Link: 2017_NZERA_Wellington_130.pdf [pdf 197 KB]