Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2018] NZERA Auckland 12
Hearing date 25-Sep-17
Determination date 15 January 2018
Member R Arthur
Representation W Reid ; K Ashcroft
Location Tauranga
Parties Dellaway-Smith v Saunders
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious Misconduct – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Office Manager
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Information relied on by respondent in disciplinary process not shown to applicant. Omission to provide her with relevant information and an opportunity to comment on information resulted in a more than minor a defect. Inadequate inquiry and further unfair disciplinary action. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: No contributory conduct. Respondent to pay $22,880 reimbursement of lost wages. $12,000 compensation appropriate.
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($22,880) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($12,000) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A ERA s103A(2) ERA s103(3) ERA s103A(4) ERA s103A(5) ERA s124 ERA s128(3) ERA s174
Cases Cited Allen v C3 Ltd [2012] NZEmpC 124 Dellaway-Smith v Wildzog Investments Ltd [2017] NZERA Auckland 163 Smith v Wildzog Investments Ltd [2018] NZERA Auckland 13 Fagotti v Acme & Co Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 135 Hall v Dionex Pty Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 29 PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security) v Da Cruz [2015] ERNZ 808 (EmpC) Richies Transport Holdings Ltd v Merennage [2015] NZEmpC 198 Sam’s Fukuyama Food Services Ltd v Zhang [2011] NZCA 608
Number of Pages 17
PDF File Link: 2018_NZERA_Auckland_12.pdf [pdf 228 KB]