| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2018] NZERA Auckland 52 |
| Determination date | 19 February 2018 |
| Member | R Arthur |
| Representation | K Milne (in person) ; D France |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Milne v Air New Zealand Ltd |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Applicant sought further investigation of employment relationship problems |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Applicant’s concerns about bullying and harassment and whether respondent properly managed her injuries were carefully considered in the Authority’s previous investigation. Applicant identified no new evidence on those issues. No realistic prospect of claims succeeding. Claims were attempt to re–litigate issues already determined. Claims were frivolous and vexatious. Application dismissed. |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | AFT v BCM [2015] NZEmpC 234 Gapuzan v Pratt & Whitney Air New Zealand Services t/a Christchurch Engine Centre [2014] NZEmpC 206 Lumsden v SkyCity Management Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 225, [2015] ERNZ 389 Milne v Air New Zealand Ltd [2011] NZERA Auckland 45 Milne v Air New Zealand Ltd [2012] NZERA Auckland 236 Milne v Air New Zealand Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 101 Milne v Air New Zealand Ltd [2016] NZERA Auckland 98 Milne v Air New Zealand Ltd [2016] NZERA Auckland 353 |
| Cases Cited | ERA s148(1) ; ERA Second Schedule cl12A |
| Number of Pages | 8 |
| PDF File Link: | 2018_NZERA_Auckland_52.pdf [pdf 224 KB] |