| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2018] NZERA Auckland 60 |
| Determination date | 27 February 2018 |
| Member | A Dallas |
| Representation | M Urlich ; no appearance (1st Rep), S Leith (2 Rep) |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Labour Inspector v Singh and anor |
| Other Parties | Kaur |
| Summary | COSTS – Second respondent sought contribution towards costs – No evidence presented of costs incurred after investigation meeting – Applicant to pay second respondent $1,000 contribution towards costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of second respondent ($1,000) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA s234 |
| Cases Cited | Fagotti v Acme & Co Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 135 Hixon v Campbell [2014] ERNZ 535 (EmpC) Labour Inspector v Binde Enterprises Ltd [2016] NZERA Auckland 399 PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 (EmpC) |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2018_NZERA_Auckland_60.pdf [pdf 100 KB] |