Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2018] NZERA Auckland 69
Hearing date 15-Aug-17
Determination date 28 February 2018
Member N Craig
Representation S Mitchell, J Lynch ; B Edwards, A Jackman
Location Hamilton
Parties O'Brien v Auckland Meat Processors Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Slaughterman
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Applicant was notified of suspension fait accompli. Respondent failed to allow him an opportunity to be heard. In the circumstances respondent should have considered the possibility of a lesser form of disciplinary action. Dismissal not reasonable in the circumstances. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: 10 per cent contributory conduct. Reinstatement declined. Respondent to pay applicant $4,256 reimbursement of lost wages. $13,500 compensation appropriate.
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($4,256.53) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($13,500) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103(5) ; ERA s103A ; ERA s124 ; ERA s125(2) ; ERA s128(2) ; ERA s174E
Cases Cited Angus v Ports of Auckland Ltd [2011] ERNZ 466 (EmpC) B & D Doors Ltd v Hamilton [2007] 5 NZELR 69 (EmpC) Harris v The Warehouse Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 188 Xtreme Dining Ltd (t/a Think Steel) v Dewar [2016] NZEmpC 136
Number of Pages 17
PDF File Link: 2018_NZERA_Auckland_69.pdf [pdf 151 KB]