| Restrictions |
OK |
| Jurisdiction |
Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No |
[2018] NZERA Auckland 379 |
| Hearing date |
07 and 08 August 2018 (2 days) |
| Determination date |
29 November 2018 |
| Member |
Rachel Larmer
|
| Representation |
Rani Amaranathan, Counsel for Applicant
Nicola Ridder and Hamish Kynaston , Counsel for Respondent
|
| Location |
Auckland |
| Parties |
OPAI
v
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
|
| Summary |
UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – Applicant claimed report prepared for purpose of managing complaint against applicant caused unjustified disadvantage – Respondents response to complaint was appropriate – The report did not unjustifiably disadvantage applicant – Communication of information to the applicant did not unjustifiably disadvantage applicant – No objectively good reason for police to disclose further information relating to complaint to applicant – Applicant not disadvantaged by decision to deal with complaints against her informally rather than through formal employment investigation or disciplinary action – Police did not make any adverse conclusions about applicant’s conduct – Report not circulated inappropriately – No unjustified disadvantage |
| Main Category |
Personal Grievance |
| Number of Pages |
45 |
| PDF File Link: |
2018 NZERA Auckland 379 [pdf 406 KB] |