| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 59/03 |
| Hearing date | 6 May 2003 |
| Determination date | 22 May 2003 |
| Member | H Doyle |
| Representation | T Wilton ; G Walker |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | NZ Amalgamated Engineering Printing & Manufacturing Union Inc & Anor v Cadbury Confectionery Ltd |
| Other Parties | Lapslie, Brosnahan |
| Summary | DISPUTE - Interpretation of collective employment agreement - Whether entitled to on-call allowance by virtue of being rostered - Clauses provided for allowance for rostered employees who were on-call for particular day - Second applicants rostered on but informed in advance that would not be required for particular day - Allowance only applied to employees who remained on-call for particular day - Did not apply to employees whose rostered shift were cancelled with adequate notice |
| Result | Question answered in favour of respondent ; Costs reserved |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |