| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 220/03 |
| Hearing date | 18 Jul 2003 |
| Determination date | 22 July 2003 |
| Member | Y S Oldfield |
| Representation | K Kaur ; No appearance |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Ashmead v Killarney Consultants Ltd |
| Summary | UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - No appearance for respondent - Applicant advised would be unable to take on long term commitment to care for baby and would resign - Reached agreement on last day of work - Dismissed 2 weeks early - Nanny agency told by respondent of alleged theft by applicant - Dismissal procedurally unfair for want of proper notice - Unjustified dismissal - ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY - Arrears of holiday pay dues and owing - Arrears of wages due and owing - Reasonable notice period 2 weeks - Two weeks pay in lieu of notice due and owing - Nanny/personal assistant |
| Result | Application granted ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($2,000) ; Arrears of wages ($1,440) ; Arrears of holiday pay ($462.36) ; Costs reserved |
| Number of Pages | 5 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |