| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 250/03 |
| Hearing date | 6 Jun 2003 |
| Determination date | 15 August 2003 |
| Member | R A Monaghan |
| Representation | W Verweij (in person) ; D Gale (in person) |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Verweij v Gale |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Identity of employer – Applicant claimed respondent promised certain payments – Applicant receptionist in premises shared by two healthcare businesses HSL and OHL – HSL recorded as applicant’s employer but applicant also did work for OHL – Respondent purchased OHL and had right to use OHL premises before settlement date in return for payment of rent and contribution to expenses (including applicant’s wages) – Respondent entitled to seek assistance from applicant – Arrangement like a serviced office – No contractual nexus between respondent and applicant – Responsibility of employment relationship with either or both HSL and OHL - Not necessary to determine dispute since respondent not applicant’s employer - Receptionist |
| Result | Application dismissed ; No order for costs |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |