Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 269/03
Hearing date 1 Sep 2003
Determination date 04 September 2003
Member R A Monaghan
Representation M Nutsford ; J Hobbs
Location Auckland
Parties Blockley and Anor v Kensington Consulting Group Ltd
Other Parties Tuckley
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Redundancy - Genuine redundancy - First applicant made aware of redundancy by co-worker as sick on day respondent attempted to inform her - Whether lack of consultation - Not case where applicants in position to suggest alternatives - Provision of information adequate - Respondent miscommunication meant first applicant not offered part time contract work which was offered to someone else - Failure to offer work meant dismissal unjustified - Second applicant's dismissal justified - ARREARS OF WAGES AND OTHER MONIES - Alleged underpayment of notice period - Whether one months notice 28 days or calendar month - Month meant calendar month - Entitled to 3 days pay not worked plus holiday pay on that amount - Alleged owed one month's salary in accord with employment agreement - Entitled to lump sum payment of one month's salary upon termination - Order that no person use or disclose any of detailed evidence about clients, potential clients and financial position of respondent, with particular reference to the initiative referred to in determination - Office administrator and geographical information systems analyst
Result Application granted (Unjustified dismissal)(SB) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($1,000); Application dismissed (unjustified dismissal)(PT) ; Application granted (Arrears of wages) (Three days owing for each applicant plus holiday pay on that amount) ; (Other monies)(One month salary for each applicant) ; Costs reserved
Cases Cited Coutts Cars Ltd v Baguley [2001] ERNZ 660
Number of Pages 5
PDF File Link: PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy.