Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 294/03
Hearing date 5 Sep 2003
Determination date 02 October 2003
Member J Wilson
Representation C Bennett ; G Armstrong
Location Auckland
Parties Laubscher v NZ Delicaressen Products Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Poor performance - Alleged failure to provide adequate training - Performance assessment identified problems - Given opportunity to improve - Responded in writing to allegations performance had not improved - Dismissed without further discussion - Alleged overstated ability in curriculum vitae - Employer required to be discerning during recruitment - Employer's responsibility to ensure employee was given every opportunity to be successful in position - Dismissal unjustified - Remedies - Misstating ability on curriculum vitae amounted to contributory conduct - Failure to mitigate - Unemployed for six months - Remedies reduced by 50 percent - Accounts assistant
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($5,400 reduced to $2,700) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($2,000 reduced to $1,000) ; Costs reserved
Statutes ERA s124;ERA s128(2)
Cases Cited NZ (with exceptions) Food Processing etc IUOW v Unilever NZ Ltd [1990] 1 NZILR 35;Trotter v Telecom Corporation of NZ Ltd [1993] 2 ERNZ 659
Number of Pages 8
PDF File Link: PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy.