| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 88/01 |
| Determination date | 20 July 2001 |
| Member | J Wilson |
| Representation | C Morris ; P Robertson |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Rodger v Te Roopu Taurima O Manukau |
| Summary | UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Constructive dismissal - Whether respondent’s conduct had the dominant purpose of coercing applicant to resign - Aspects of employment relationship were less than perfect - Unhappy with perceived treatment by respondent - Hui was not a disciplinary meeting - Aspects of employment relationship were less than perfect - Dissatisfaction with employer did not constitute constructive dismissal - Failed to establish respondent’s conduct was such that the applicant could not be expected to put up with it - Senior service development manager |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Cases Cited | Auckland Electric Power Board v Auckland Provincial District Local Authorities Officers IUOW [1994] 1 ERNZ 168;Auckland etc Shop Employees etc IUOW v Woolworths (NZ) Ltd [1985] ACJ 963 |
| Number of Pages | 11 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |