| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 56A/03 |
| Determination date | 03 November 2003 |
| Member | D Asher |
| Representation | S Kissling ; P McBride |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Drumm v Spotless Services (NZ) Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Consent order granted with costs reserved for respondent's application - Since investigation incomplete unable to determine merits of applicant's position claim - Unable to determine significance of Calderbank or indicate what costs would have ordered if applicant not legally aided - Costs not available to applicant since issue reserved in substantive decision - Costs to lie where they fall |
| Result | Costs to lie where they fall |
| Statutes | ERA s149;Legal Services Act 2000 s40(1);Legal Services Act 2000 s40(2);Legal Services Act 2000 s40(4) |
| Cases Cited | Barrett v Te Runanga O Ngati Pu Incorporated unreported, Chambers J, 16 April 2002, CP 52/00;Jones v Wiremakers Ltd [2000] 1 ERNZ 33;Wadley v Salon D'Orsay Ltd [1998] 1 ERNZ 369 |
| Number of Pages | 5 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |