| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 122/03 |
| Determination date | 06 November 2003 |
| Member | H Doyle |
| Representation | G Jones ; R McCabe, K Thompson |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Pearce and Ors v Mount Cook Airline Ltd and Anor |
| Other Parties | Tait, Palmer, Merrick, Child, Hill, New Zealand Airline Pilots Association |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Disclosure of documents - Dispute regarding selection of seniority for pilots as per collective agreement - Applicant sought minutes of collective negotiations, emails and correspondence regarding seniority selection - Sought request from Authority for documents - Authority may call for evidence under s161(a) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 - Whether documents would assist investigation meeting - Dispute concerned interpretation of words of collective agreement - Unnecessary to call for documents sought - Authority would request documents if necessary at investigation meeting - Airline pilots |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Statutes | Contractual Remedies Act 1979 s6;ERA s161(a);ERA s162 |
| Cases Cited | Metargem v Employment Relations Authority & Ors [2003] 2 ERNZ 186 |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |