| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 29/04 |
| Hearing date | 14 Jan 2004 |
| Determination date | 21 January 2004 |
| Member | Y S Oldfield |
| Representation | M Crotty ; No appearance |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | D v NB Ltd and Anor |
| Other Parties | Y |
| Summary | COMPLIANCE ORDER - Alleged failure to comply with Authority determination - Non-payment of remedies - Authority found unjustified dismissal and sexual harassment - Respondents did not dispute monies owed were unpaid - First respondent no longer trading and without funds - First respondent ordered to pay remedies within 14 days - Second respondent allegedly without assets - Strikingly different from financial circumstances described during investigation - Lack of credibility caused doubt in good faith in meeting obligations - Second respondent ordered to pay full amount in three instalments - Interim name suppression ordered in earlier decision |
| Result | Application granted ; Compliance ordered ; No order for costs |
| Statutes | ERA s137;ERA s138(3);ERA s138(4) |
| Cases Cited | Canterbury Hotel etc IUOW v Gosling unreported, Palmer J, 11 December 1989, CEC 91/89 |
| Number of Pages | 5 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |