Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 34/04
Hearing date 31 Oct 2003
Determination date 22 January 2004
Member K J Anderson
Representation A McKay ; E Hudson
Location Auckland
Parties Rose v Kathleen B Orr Psychologist Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Whether constructive dismissal - Family commitments and associated stress - Required to take day off work to be at hospital with mother - Alleged aggressive approach by respondent - Offered to resigned - Confirmed resignation when asked - Should have taken less aggressive approach given applicant's mental state - Failed to allow applicant to leave workplace to consider future before accepting resignation - Respondent experienced clinical psychologist - Reasonably foreseeable substantial likelihood would resign - Constructive dismissal - Dismissal unjustified - Remedies - Consistent failure by applicant to accept workplace accountability - Contribution 40% - Practice Manager
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($6,328.75 reduced to $3,797.25)(3 months) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($6,000 reduced to $3,600) ; Costs reserved
Statutes ERA s123(b);ERA s124;ERA s128(2);ERA s128(3)
Cases Cited Auckland Electric Power Board v Auckland Provincial Local Authorities Officers IUOW [1994] 1 ERNZ 168;Auckland etc Shop Employees etc IUOW v Woolworths (NZ) Ltd [1985] ACJ 963; [1985] 2 NZLR 372;Compass Union of NZ Inc v Carlton & United Breweries (NZ) Pty Ltd [1992] 1 ERNZ 1;Wellington etc Clerical Workers IUOW v Greenwich [1983] ACJ 965
Number of Pages 10
PDF File Link: PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy.