| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 35/04 |
| Determination date | 23 January 2004 |
| Member | R A Monaghan |
| Representation | G Froggatt ; S Heywood |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Kaitani v Stagecoach New Zealand |
| Summary | DISPUTE - Alleged owed monies for unpaid meal allowances pursuant to collective agreement - Timing and location of rostered meal breaks in relevant shifts - Provision in CA for meal allowance in certain circumstances - Applicant had two rostered meal breaks one hour apart - Alleged since second meal break at depot with tea facilities within span of continuous work pursuant to CA, no entitlement to allowance for first break - Whether properly labelled as meal breaks - Second meal breaks should not have been properly regarded as meal break pursuant to CA - Applicant entitled to meal allowance for first break - Matter referred to parties to calculate quantum with leave reserved to refer matter to Authority |
| Result | Application granted ; Orders accordingly ; Costs reserved |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |