| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 44/04 |
| Hearing date | 26 Nov 2003 |
| Determination date | 04 February 2004 |
| Member | K J Anderson |
| Representation | Yap (In person) ; P Swarbrick |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Yap v Auckland Commercial Painting Ltd |
| Summary | UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Redundancy - Whether substantively justified and procedurally fair - Decline in business caused respondent to reduce staff - Proposals put forward by applicant - Whether final proposal included redundancy and payment of notice - Respondent alleged accepted final proposal and redundancy by consent - No procedural deficiencies - Applicant proposed acceptable redundancy conditions - Dismissal justified - Quantity surveyor |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |