| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 58/04 |
| Hearing date | 15 Dec 2003 |
| Determination date | 23 February 2004 |
| Member | K J Anderson |
| Representation | GA Walsh ; S Scott |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Goodwin v Flay t/a Valmai Rest Home |
| Summary | UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Applicant off work on accident compensation - Applicant alleged was dismissed - Applicant sent letter that respondent's business for sale and employment would terminate at end of month - Applicant assumed had been dismissed prior to specified date of termination - No evidence to suggest applicant could have reasonably or sensibly reached such conclusion - Obligation to inform respondent of current situation regarding absence from workplace - Not dismissed but simply failed to notify employer she was not going to return prior to date of termination at end of month - ARREARS OF WAGES - Alleged owed 30 hours pay wrongly deducted - Claim not proven - RECOVERY OF MONEY - Counterclaim - Alleged received payments not entitled to in first week on ACC - Claim not proven - Caregiver |
| Result | Application dismissed (Unjustified dismissal) ; Application dismissed (Counterclaim) ; Costs reserved |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |