| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 93/04 |
| Hearing date | 15 Mar 2004 |
| Determination date | 15 March 2004 |
| Member | V Campbell |
| Representation | P Skelton ; J Latimer |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Johnson v Prism Group Holdings |
| Summary | ARREARS OF HOLIDAY PAY - Urgent interim determination of holiday pay - Substantive application concerned whether purported variation to employment agreement enforceable - Claimed payment for 66 days annual leave outstanding - Accepted any holiday pay found to be properly owing should have been paid - Respondent submitted $20,000 paid to applicant in part payment of monies outstanding including holiday pay - Purpose of $20,000 payment inextricably linked to whether purported variation enforceable - Authority unable to determine quantum of applicant's holiday pay until substantive application resolved - Managing director and chief executive officer |
| Result | Quantum reserved ; No order for costs |
| Statutes | Holidays Act 1981 s12;Holidays Act 1981 s12(1A);Holidays Act 1981 s13;Holidays Act 1981 s31 |
| Cases Cited | Burns v Radio Pacific Ltd [1998] 3 ERNZ 559;Marine Helicopters Ltd v Stevenson [1996] 1 ERNZ 472;Napier Aero Club Inc v Tayler [1998] 1 ERNZ 241 |
| Number of Pages | 7 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |