| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 121/04 |
| Hearing date | 2 Apr 2004 - 5 Apr 2004 (2 days) |
| Determination date | 14 April 2004 |
| Member | M Urlich |
| Representation | G Pollak ; I Davidson |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Sherwin v Shopper Anonymous New Zealand |
| Summary | UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Redundancy - Genuine redundancy - Although work still had to be performed did not mean position remained - Redundancy procedure in employment agreement not followed - Breach of good faith obligations by giving inaccurate information about meeting - Dismissal procedurally unjustified - Remedies - No position to reinstate to - As redundancy genuine no lost remuneration resulted from personal grievance - Entitled to one month car allowance as part of pay in lieu of notice - No agreement on how bonus to be calculated - Bonus to be calculated as employer saw fit - No bonus payable - General Manager |
| Result | Application granted ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($5,000) ; Car allowance ($800) |
| Number of Pages | 7 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |