| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 48/04 |
| Determination date | 23 April 2004 |
| Member | P Montgomery |
| Representation | L Andersen, A Patterson ; B Dorking |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | C v Fogelberg, Vice Chancellor of University of Otago |
| Summary | COSTS - Unsuccessful personal grievance - 1ï¾½ day investigation meeting - Respondent put to considerable expense in defending decision to dismiss - Regard had to financial situation of applicant - Not unduly complex case - Important for both parties to have issue determined - Reasonable contribution appropriate - Non-publication order in substantive determination prohibiting publication of certain information |
| Result | Costs in favour of respondent ($2,000) ; Disbursements ($15.15) |
| Cases Cited | Beardsley v Canpac International Ltd unreported, YS Oldfield, 29 May 2001, AA 39A/01;Binnie v Pacific Health Ltd [2002] 1 ERNZ 438;Harwood v Next Homes Ltd [2003] 2 ERNZ 433;Reid v New Zealand Fire Service Commission [1995] 2 ERNZ 38 |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |