Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No CA 65/04
Hearing date 26 Jan 2004 - 25 Mar 2004 (3 days)
Determination date 04 June 2004
Member H Doyle
Representation D Beck ; J Goldstein
Location Christchurch
Parties Redington v Sisson
Summary ARREARS OF WAGES - Alleged payment for overtime owing - Specific situations where overtime worked either at respondent's request or with respondent's knowledge - Agreement that applicant would be able to take paid time off in lieu - Monies due and owing - General claim for additional half to one hour per day worked not accepted - UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Alleged breach of health and safety legislation - Sore hands - Stress about workload - Applicant did not mention concerns to respondent - No unjustified disadvantage - Alleged conduct which undermined trust and confidence - Physically threatening behaviour - Respondent lost temper on three occasions and did not give applicant adequate or safe opportunity to respond - Inappropriate and derogatory language used went further than lack of politeness - Applicant disadvantaged because felt less secure and intimidated - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Constructive dismissal - Applicant did not return to work after last incident - Reason for not returning stress and hand injury - Departure not reasonably foreseeable to respondent - No unjustified dismissal - Remedies - Unable to work for three months because of hand injury and stress - No link between cause of loss of remuneration and grievance - Entitled to balance of sick leave - Contributory conduct - Applicant's failure to file court documents was focus of last incident - Contributory conduct 20 percent - PENALTY- No wage and time record - Moderate penalty appropriate - Typist
Result Application dismissed (Unjustified dismissal) ; Application granted (Unjustified disadvantage and arrears of wages) ; Arrears of wages ($450) ; Reimbursement of lost wages (Sick leave) ; Compensation for humiliation, etc ($6,000 reduced to $4,800) ; Penalty payable to Crown ($100) ; Costs reserved
Statutes ERA s130(2);ERA s130(4);ERA s132(2)
Cases Cited NZ Woollen Workers IUOW v Distinctive Knitwear NZ Ltd [1990] 2 NZILR 438
Number of Pages 9
PDF File Link: PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy.