| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 213/04 |
| Hearing date | 15 Jun 2004 |
| Determination date | 22 June 2004 |
| Member | M Urlich |
| Representation | C Jessup (In person) ; No appearance |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Jessup (Labour Inspector) v Easyframe Ltd |
| Summary | ARREARS OF HOLIDAY PAY - No appearance for respondent - Application to recover holiday pay owing to two employees - Respondent agreed that monies would be paid - Statement of reply stated monies unpaid because employees not willing to work over period of time - Monies due and owing - Interest 6.5 percent - PENALTY - Respondent failed to honour agreement to pay - Failed to attend mediation as directed - Advanced unsustainable arguments to support failure to pay - No evidence respondent unable to pay - Penalty warranted - COSTS - Applicant entitled to recover filing fee - Hammer man and fabricator/erector |
| Result | Application granted ; Arrears of holiday pay ($1,192) ; Interest (6.5 percent) ; Penalty in favour of Crown ($1,000) ; Filing fee ($70) |
| Statutes | Holidays Act 1981 s21(2);Holidays Act 1981 s34 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |