Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No CA 96/04
Hearing date 17 Jun 2004
Determination date 13 August 2004
Member V Campbell
Representation J kerr ; R Gibson
Location Christchurch
Parties Evans and Ors v The Richmond Fellowship New Zealand
Other Parties Hale, Howard, McFadden, Strong, Whero
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Ongoing collective bargaining - Respondent renegotiated terms of employment with all non-union members and offered wage increases - Refused to negotiate individual terms of employment with union members while collective bargaining still underway - Union members rejected proposed collective agreements containing similar wage increases - No unjustified disadvantage - Finding no disadvantage promoted protection of integrity of individual choice - PERSONAL GRIEVANCE - Discrimination - Refusal to pass on same terms of employment not result of involvement in union activities rather reluctance to bargain twice in respect of same employees - Offers of similar wage increases rejected - No discrimination as result of union membership - Duress - No improper coercion or threats by respondent with intention of having applicants resign from union - Offers of similar wage increases meant no incentive or advantage withheld - No duress in relation to membership of union - APPLICATION FOR DECLARATION - Respondent sought declaration that applicants acted contrary to good faith - Applicants brought employment relationship problem to Authority in good faith - No ulterior motives - Declaration refused
Result Application dismissed (Applicants) ; Application dismissed (Respondent) ; Costs reserved
Statutes ERA s103;ERA s104;ERA s107;ERA s110
Cases Cited Carter Holt Harvey Ltd v National Distribution Union Inc [2002] 1 ERNZ 239;National Union of Public Employees Inc v Richmond Fellowship New Zealand unreported, H Doyle, 17 July 2003, CA 78/03
Number of Pages 12
PDF File Link: PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy.