| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 147B/04 |
| Determination date | 25 August 2004 |
| Member | L Robinson |
| Representation | D McLeod ; DD Rishworth |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Waikanae Holdings (Gisborne) Ltd v Smith |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Stay - Costs determination in favour of respondent - Applicant elected to challenge substantive and costs determinations to Employment Court - Application for stay of costs determination - Challenge to be heard in 7 weeks' time - Relatively short period demonstrated applicant's commitment to prosecuting challenge and made executing costs determination impractical and inefficient - Stay ordered |
| Result | Application granted ; Stay ordered ; No order for costs |
| Statutes | ERA s180;ECR r64 |
| Cases Cited | APN New Zealand Ltd v NZ Amalgamated Engineering Printing and Manufacturing Union Inc unreported, McGrath, William Young, O'Regan JJ, 24 March 2004, CA 234/03;Koia v Attorney-General in respect of the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Justice unreported, Colgan J, 23 February 2004, AC 8/04;Nankivell v TBL Developments Ltd t/a DTA Performance Consulting Group NZ unreported, J Wilson, 15 April 2004, AA 124/04;New Zealand Post Primary Teachers' Association v Attorney-General (on behalf of Ministry of Education) (No 3) [1991] 3 ERNZ 708 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |