| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 105/04 |
| Hearing date | 24 Aug 2004 |
| Determination date | 27 August 2004 |
| Member | P Cheyne |
| Representation | I Thompson ; N appearance |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Disseveld v Axe Mark Holdings Ltd |
| Summary | UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Redundancy - No appearance for respondent - Direction that correct identity of respondent be recorded - Genuine redundancy - Process of consultation adequate in circumstances - No unjustified dismissal - COSTS - Appeared respondent incurred no legal costs - Even if had incurred costs failure to properly engage in investigation and resulting trouble to Authority and applicant would have meant no award in respondent's favour - Furniture sprayer |
| Result | Application dismissed ; No order for costs |
| Cases Cited | Coutts Cars v Baguley [2001] ERNZ 660 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |