| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 273A/04 |
| Determination date | 21 September 2004 |
| Member | L Robinson |
| Representation | R Denmead ; H Sherborne, S Hotham (in person) |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Milne (Labour Inspector) v Colourstory Ltd and Anor |
| Other Parties | Hotham |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Application by respondent for extension of time to comply with Authority's order - Alleged reason for extension to consult with solicitor and accountant - Extension of 24 days sought but time for filing any challenge to Court expired in 6 days - Appeared respondent actually sought stay of determination - Application for stay not made in accordance with regulations - Authority declined to consider informal application for stay - Should be made on notice with grounds particularised - May have been different had respondent indicated unequivocal intention to meet orders |
| Result | Application dismissed ; No order for costs |
| Statutes | ECR r65(2);ERA s179 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |