Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 328/04
Hearing date 1 Oct 2004 - 2 Oct 2004 (2 days)
Determination date 04 October 2004
Member M Urlich
Representation C Patterson ; S Turner
Location Auckland
Parties Lord v Fletcher Steel Ltd t/a Pacific Steel
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Redundancy - Genuineness of redundancy not challenged - Collective agreement provisions on redundancy did not apply to applicant - Electricity supply crisis - Decided one shift manager to be made redundant - Applicant's position made redundant - Alleged selection predetermined and process flawed - Respondent did not give applicant adequate opportunity to seek advice and representation - Fair and reasonable opportunity for consultation provided - Applicant took various comments and actions as showing it was predetermined he would be made redundant - No predetermination - Not given opportunity to comment on selection assessment - Procedurally unfair - Unjustified dismissal - Alleged actions post dismissal breached obligations of good faith - Alleged respondent refused to provide reference and provided negative reference - Alleged respondent advised the ceasing of assistance programme - Alleged respondent advised employment consultant had raised personal grievance - Sought award of exemplary damages - No breaches of good faith - Refusal to provide reference not breach of good faith - Remedies - Not entitled to pro-rated bonus payment - Contractual benefit of medical premiums should have been paid for notice period - No exemplary damages warranted - Shift manager
Result Application granted ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($7,000) ; Orders accordingly Costs reserved
Statutes Privacy Act 1993
Cases Cited Apiata v Telecom New Zealand Ltd [1998] 2 ERNZ 130;New Zealand Fasteners Stainless Ltd v Thwaites [2000] 1 ERNZ 739
Number of Pages 20
PDF File Link: PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy.