| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Wellington |
| Reference No | WA 164/04 |
| Determination date | 26 November 2004 |
| Member | D Asher |
| Representation | L Highfield ; no appearance |
| Location | Wellington |
| Parties | Munro v Village Care New Plymouth Ltd t/a Highlands Lodge |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - COMPLIANCE ORDER - Application for compliance order - Application for urgency and abridgement of time - Previous determination found applicant unjustifiably dismissed by first respondent and awarded remedies - Corporate veil lifted to permit recovery of awards from second respondent - Respondents had not complied with determination - Second respondent placed into liquidation prior to application for compliance - First respondent placed into liquidation after application - Prevented from commencing proceedings against second respondent unless authorised by liquidator or Court - No practical benefit in proceeding against first respondent given previous determination lifting corporate veil - Application treated as withdrawn - Able to be refiled without fee in event of liquidator's agreement or Court order |
| Result | Application withdrawn ; Costs reserved |
| Statutes | Companies Act 1993 s248 |
| Cases Cited | Munro v Village Care New Plymouth Ltd t/a Highland Lodge unreported, D Asher, 16 July 2004, WA 88/04;Munro v Village Care New Plymouth Ltd t/a Highlands Lodge [2004] 2 ERNZ 40;Munro v Village New Plymouth Ltd t/a Highlands Lodge unreported, D Asher, 26 November 2004, WA 88A/04 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |