| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 405/04 |
| Hearing date | 19 Oct 2004 |
| Determination date | 10 December 2004 |
| Member | K Raureti |
| Representation | P Spanswick ; N Dines |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Williams and Anor v Toll Logistics (NZ) Ltd |
| Other Parties | Mitchell |
| Summary | UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Applicants employed as casual foremen - Respondent rang them to say no longer required as casual foremen but work could be available as casual watersiders - Alleged unjustified disadvantage as no consultation and no selection criteria provided - Alleged expectation of ongoing work - Under collective employment agreement respondent had no obligation to offer any subsequent engagement - No established pattern or continuity of work that could have legitimately given rise to ongoing expectation - May have been preferable for respondent to consult - No breach of contractual obligations - No personal grievance - Casual foremen |
| Result | Application dismissed ; No order for costs |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |