| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Wellington |
| Reference No | WA 24/05 |
| Determination date | 09 February 2005 |
| Member | V Campbell |
| Location | Wellington |
| Parties | Tindall and Anor v Watha Management Ltd and Ors |
| Other Parties | Oakley, Cantab Management Ltd, Wella Holdings Ltd, Osmond, Advisorcorp Inc Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Found first applicant employed by first respondent and had successful personal grievance - Also found second applicant not employed by any of the respondents - No written employment agreement meant applicant had no option other than to name all possible respondents in order to allow Authority to determine matter - Applicants unrepresented at investigation meeting but had received legal advice and assistance up until week beforehand - On balance as matter of discretion in equity and good conscience costs should lie where they fall |
| Result | Costs to lie where they fall |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | wa 24_05.pdf [pdf 13 KB] |