| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 57/05 |
| Hearing date | 15 Feb 2005 |
| Determination date | 15 February 2005 |
| Member | M Urlich |
| Representation | P Skelton ; J Hannan |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Bruhns v Deloitte Consulting NZ LLC |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Provision of documents - Respondent sought a number of documents be provided by applicant by way of sworn list - Also sought provision of documents from third party - Possible conflict of interest on Authority member's part raised - Application relocated but agreed member would determine preliminary issue - Respondent had raised estoppel defence which Authority could only consider fully if certain information provided - Applicant ordered to provide certain information to Authority and respondent - Orders as to how documentation to be provided to respondent set out - All documents directed by way of determination to be used only for purposes of investigation - Examination of documents directed to be provided to be respondent was limited to counsel and one employee of respondent - No order made about documents from third party - Timetabling directions given |
| Result | Orders accordingly ; No order for costs |
| Statutes | ERA s160(1)(a) |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 57_05.pdf [pdf 15 KB] |