| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 21/05 |
| Determination date | 21 February 2005 |
| Member | R A Monaghan |
| Representation | I Thompson ; R Zwarst |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Disseveld v Axe Mark Holdings Ltd |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Application to reopen Authority investigation - Authority had found applicant did not have personal grievance in respect of his redundancy - Applicant sought reopening because respondent had failed to provide statement in reply or attend Authority investigation - Adverse findings against respondents guilty of inaction not automatic - Open for Authority to take approach it did - No material provided that would suggest provision of additional information by respondent could affect outcome - Application declined |
| Result | Application dismissed ; No order for costs |
| Cases Cited | Disseveld v Axe Mark Holdings Ltd unreported, P Cheyne, 27 August 2004, CA 105/04 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 21_05.pdf [pdf 18 KB] |