| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 36/05 |
| Hearing date | 2 Feb 2005 |
| Determination date | 14 March 2005 |
| Member | H Doyle |
| Representation | J Walker (in person) ; G Hill |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Walker v Coro Trading New Zealand Ltd t/a BP Connect Edgeware |
| Summary | DISPUTE - Whether applicant should have been paid in-charge allowance provided for in collective agreement since October 2003 - Alleged should be paid allowance of 50 cents on top of his ordinary rate - Respondent alleged applicant's remuneration already included appropriate in-charge rate - Interpretation of agreement - Applicant entitled to allowance of 50 cents per hour on top of ordinary rate from October 2003 - COMPLIANCE ORDER - Applicant sought compliance order for prospective breach by respondent - Not prepared to make order for prospective breach - No issue of damages - COSTS - No expense incurred by parties with respect to representation - Applicant entitled to reimbursement of lodgement fee of $70 - Shift supervisor |
| Result | Question answered in favour of applicant ; Application for compliance order declined ; No order for costs ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($70)(Lodgement fee) |
| Number of Pages | 5 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |