| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 101/05 |
| Determination date | 29 March 2005 |
| Member | Y S Oldfield |
| Representation | P Caccioppoli (in person) ; C Patterson, P Gunn |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Caccioppoli v Board of Trustees of Edmund Hillary School and Anor |
| Other Parties | The Attorney General in respect of the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Education |
| Summary | COSTS - Authority had found no employment relationship between applicant (as chairman of first respondent) and first respondent - First respondent sought 60 percent of total costs of $3,686 - Costs higher than what would have thought reasonable - Entitled to reasonable contribution to reasonable costs - Second respondent, who was joined as a crucial player in the matter also sought costs - Second respondent alleged total costs of $8,000 but sought $1,000 - $1,000 very reasonable level of contribution |
| Result | Costs in favour of first respondent ($1,000) ; Costs in favour of second respondent ($1,000) |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 101_05.pdf [pdf 11 KB] |