| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 140/05 |
| Hearing date | 19 Apr 2005 |
| Determination date | 19 April 2005 |
| Member | R A Monaghan |
| Representation | A Hirst (in person) ; S Liu |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Hirst v Japanese Auto Services Ltd |
| Summary | UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Alleged dismissed when attempted to return to work after two week absence due to illness - Respondent allegedly intended to convey to applicant that he should take the time needed to fully recover - On balance no dismissal - ARREARS OF HOLIDAY PAY - Arrears of holiday pay for total of nine statutory and annual leave days due and owing - Gross pay figure not available - Net amount awarded on understanding that respondent liable to account for tax to Inland Revenue Department - Respondent cautioned for failure to keep wage records as required - Panel beater |
| Result | Application dismissed (Unjustified dismissal) ; Application granted (Arrears of holiday pay) ; Arrears of holiday pay ($648 net) ; No order for costs ; Disbursements ($70)(Filing fee) |
| Statutes | ERA s130 |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 140_05.pdf [pdf 10 KB] |