| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 138/05 |
| Hearing date | 11 Apr 2005 |
| Determination date | 19 April 2005 |
| Member | D King |
| Representation | DA Hyde (in person) ; M Tweed |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Hyde v Tweed Trading Ltd |
| Summary | UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Dispute between applicant and respondent - Applicant said was leaving and wanted his holiday pay - Company vehicle repossessed from applicant’s home that evening and applicant informed in response to question that would not be required to work next day - Applicant subsequently turned up for work and told by respondent that he did not work there anymore - Employment terminated at applicant’s initiative during dispute - Later regret concerning decision not relevant - No dismissal - ARREARS OF WAGES - Agreed amount owing for weekend hours worked - In absence of written employment agreement respondent not able to offset amount against alleged excessive private use of work vehicle |
| Result | Application dismissed (Unjustified dismissal) ; Application granted (Arrears of wages) ; Arrears of wages ($310) ; Costs reserved |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 138_05.pdf [pdf 9 KB] |